Under the FAQ for 3.5, it states that one can access the torrc file via: "the TBB directory under Data/Tor/Torrc". Going through the comments on this and other blog entries, I'm noticing a lack of answers to questions the above type of problem. Give reason or just shut your mouth because you obviously have nothing real to say. It's easy to label someone, and rather childish in the face of something as serious as government's overreaching eyes. You need to give reason to refute their claims, not simply call them a conspiracy nut. Well, I suppose to anyone who's liberal, the bashing thing works rather well, but still, anyone serious about anonymity, you need to give the respect they deserve and don't be bashing people. You continue to resort to bashing those you don't want people to agree with, and you become the person suspected of lying. You have a reason to say what you say, then state it. My point is, you sitting here bashing people as conspiracy nuts for simply stating their concerns and opinions regarding the integrity of an anonymous internet network makes you sound like you have a stake in people simply dismissing him as a conspiracy nut. You think they can't be bought? You think government isn't interested in buying them? You can see what government has been doing.ĭo you honestly believe that they have not already tried to find ways of cracking the anonymity of such a wide-spread and popular anonymous network of internet users? It's also true that every time we find out some new gov't (or private) agency's previously unimaginable capability, we're surprised! Why? Are we really that short on memory? I guess so.ĭude, exactly why do you believe the Tor staff is above reproach? Why do you have this savior mentality regarding the Tor staff? No one can really expect NOT to raise suspicion when organizations take large sums from (one of) the very groups that it's trying to help users avoid. It's also true (for human nature), that the adages are true, "Perception is reality," & "You're judged by the company you keep." People running for public office don't pal around w/ known crime bosses.įrom "thinking" private users' perspective of anonymity & security, it has & always will be a stupid, stupid idea to take large sums from "one of the enemy." It MAY be that funding from other sources is hard to find, but it's still STUPID. Sure, many say, "But it's open source & anyone, anywhere can examine it." The other thing that gives a great # of "experts" pause, is Tor Project's LONG standing relationship w/ U.S. yes, as long as there are MASSIVE numbers of docs like Snowden released, there will be "theorists." If it's actually happened / still happening, is it still just a "theory?"
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |